

Seu próximo nível começa aqui
Com a Assinatura Ilimitada, você tem tudo que precisa para sua aprovação.
Com a Assinatura Ilimitada, você combina prática, teoria e método em uma única assinatura com tudo que você precisa para sua aprovação.
For many decades the predominant method of language instruction was the grammar-translation method. This method is rooted in the teaching of the nineteenth century and was widely used for the first half (in some parts of the world even longer) of the last century to teach modern foreign languages (Richards and Rodgers 2001). [...] The Grammar-translation Method was not without its opponents, and the demand for oral proficiency led to several counter and parallel movements that laid the foundation for the development of new ways of teaching, as we still know them today. One such method is the Direct Method, sometimes also referred to as the Berlitz Method as it was widely used in Berlitz schools. Some reformers of the nineteenth century (e.g., Gouin and Sauveur) believed that languages should be taught in a natural way, that is, how children learn language. As Richards and Rodgers (2001) point out, believers in the Natural Method argued that a foreign language could be taught without translation or the use of the learner's native language if meaning was conveyed directly through demonstration and action (p. 11). For this reason, they also strongly promoted the spontaneous use of language.
According to the text, choose a procedure that WAS NOT used in the Direct Method.
Classroom instruction was conducted exclusively in the target language.
Everyday vocabulary and sentences were taught. Concrete vocabulary was taught through demonstrating objects and pictures; abstract vocabulary was taught by association of ideas.
Oral communication skills were built up in a carefully graded progression organized around questionanswer exchanges between teachers and students in small, intensive classes.
Grammar was taught inductively. Correct pronunciation and grammar were not emphasized.
New teaching points were introduced orally. Both speaking and listening comprehension were taught.
In the realm of English language teaching, communicative language teaching (CLT) has gained prominence. Choose the correct option that best summarizes the focus of communicative language teaching and how it differs from traditional methods.
CLT focuses on memorization of vocabulary.
CLT emphasizes real-life communication and interaction.
CLT encourages rote learning of grammar rules.
CLT promotes individual learning without interaction.
CLT prioritizes traditional teaching methods.
Integral Education promotes equity by recognizing the right of all individuals to learn and access differentiated educational opportunities.
Certo
Errado
Having students orally share their thoughts about a particular English novel in a WhatsApp group is an example of
a socioaffective learning strategy associated with mobile-assisted language learning.
using literature to practice communication skills with fixed technology.
a metacognitive learning strategy within an m-learning environment.
using literature to foster reading skills.
Getting students to use their knowledge of the English language to produce content for a podcast, for example, can be considered as a project-based experience to learn with a more practical approach.
Certo
Errado