

Seu próximo nível começa aqui
Com a Assinatura Ilimitada, você tem tudo que precisa para sua aprovação.
Com a Assinatura Ilimitada, você combina prática, teoria e método em uma única assinatura com tudo que você precisa para sua aprovação.
Information questions, also known as Wh-questions, are essential tools for gathering data and maintaining social interaction in English. In what concerns the formation and usage of these interrogative structures, choose the correct alternative.
The question word 'Whose' is used to ask about the reason for an action, and it must be always followed by a verb in the third person singular of the present.
In indirect questions, the word order is exactly the same as in direct questions, and the use of 'if' or 'whether' is strictly forbidden by municipal law.
Tag questions are formed by repeating the main verb of the sentence in its affirmative form at the end of every interrogation to show extreme doubt.
Wh-questions are formed using an interrogative word (like who, where, when, why) and usually follow a subject-auxiliary inversion in the main clause.
Regarding the collocation "back in print" in the final paragraph, analyze the statements below:
I. It functions as a technical shorthand in the literary world; it specifically emphasizes the availability of the content to the general public rather than the physical act of pressing ink onto paper.
II. It signals to the reader that the work has returned to the "active" catalogue of a publisher, making it a crucial term for libraries and book collectors to identify titles that are no longer "rare" or "out of print."
III. The author uses "back in print" as a prepositional collocation to indicate the specific medium of the reissue.
The CORRECT statements are:
Only II and III.
Only I and III.
Only I and II.
I, II, and III.
In the first paragraph, why does the author use the phrasing "there have been over 60 volumes released" instead of simply saying "the library released 60 volumes in 2018"?
To emphasize the ongoing growth and current status of the collection, linking the past successes to the fact that these 60 books are available for the reader to buy right now.
To describe a temporary situation that is happening exactly at this second, similar to how one would describe a live event or a breaking news story.
To indicate that the 60 volumes were canceled or lost in the past, focusing the reader's attention on a failed business venture.
To show that the number 60 is a future prediction, signaling that the library expects to reach this number only after several more years of work.
The text mainly criticizes:
the complete disappearance of technology in modern society.
the lack of access to digital communication.
the contradiction between fast communication and superficial relationships.
the excessive use of books in schools.
the replacement of smartphones by computers.
A student reads an article about climate change in English and quickly skims through it to identify the main topic and the author's general stance. Which reading strategy is the student primarily employing?
Skimming
Scanning
Intensive reading
Extensive reading
Prediction
Choose the correct sentence in the Simple Past:
They go to school yesterday.
They gone to school yesterday.
They goed to school yesterday.
They went to school yesterday.
They going to school yesterday.
There is a noticeable preference for the simple present tense throughout the movie review instead of the past tense. With this in mind, which of the following alternatives BEST explains why?
The author avoids the past tense because the movie's conspiracy is an event that hasn't ended yet.
The author is describing ongoing actions that happened during the movie, but which have no relevance to the final product.
The critic is focused solely on his future plans to watch other bank robbery films like Den of Thieves or Triple 9.
The critic is describing the events of the movie as if they are currently happening, which is a standard convention for summarizing plots and analyzing media.
The word “however” in the text indicates an idea of:
cause.
conclusion.
contrast.
time.
explanation.
Analyze the sentence below focusing only on the use of the Simple Future tense. Identify which part of the sentence is in the Simple Future.
“She will meet him later (Part 1), since she said she enjoyed the date yesterday (Part 2).”
Only Part 1 is in the Simple Future.
Only Part 2 is in the Simple Future.
Both parts are in the Simple Future.
Neither part is in the Simple Future.
In the fragment of paragraph 2, “this represents not just a moral imperative, but also a major opportunity to unlock a new and largely untapped market”, the linking words not just… but also indicate a(an)
absolute alternative
brief comparison
clear contrast
deep consequence
emphatic addition
The Hodgsoniana is a literary website and in the introduction the author never uses phrases like “going to” (e.g. “I am going to write about William Hodgson”). Mark the alternative that best explains the reason for that
The author avoids “going to” because it carries a sense of aspiration and purpose.
The author avoids “going to” because it often sounds too formal and his intentions are the opposite.
The phrase “going to” is often used for immediate plans, its absence makes the text sound more formal.
Replacing “I hope” (final paragraph) with “I am going to hope” would keep the same meaning.
The phrase “going to” does not appear in the text because the author expresses his goals using the future tense.
According to the text, Sam Gafford was an important scholar on William Hope Hodgson studies. What does it imply to be a scholar?
Sam Gafford has a bachelor’s degree from an unspecified university.
Sam Gafford has a master’s degree on the subject of William Hodgson works.
Sam Gafford has a graduate degree on the subject of William Hodgson.
Sam Gafford has deep expertise in the work of William Hope Hodgson.
Sam Gafford has a Ph.D. on the subject of William Hodgson.
The Hodgsoniana blog owner mentions that, in the worst case scenario, he will have a medium to write his thoughts on William Hodgson. What is the expression he uses to describe this worst case scenario and the best substitution?
“At the very least” and could be replaced by “At the absolute minimum”.
“At the very least” and could be replaced by “At best”.
“At the very least” and could be replaced by “At the best”.
“At the very least” and could be replaced by “At the worse”.
“At the very least” and could be replaced by “At a humble scenario”.
Which of the following underline words is written in the simple past?
I entered into brief correspondence with Sam at that time.
New research on Hodgson, details of Hodgson-related happenings
Findings I’ve been meaning to write up.
The aim of this blog is to provide a resource for anyone interested in the life and work of William Hope Hodgson
By providing this site others may be moved to contribute their own thoughts and research
In the second paragraph, the text states: The investigation takes Montgomery and his team (Adrian Grenier, Dave Bautista, and Lydia Hull) through the remains of a years-old conspiracy. Considering this, mark the CORRECT alternative regarding the use of parentheses in this sentence.
The parentheses are used to emphasize that the presence of these specific actors is the most critical element of the film's success.
The parentheses enclose supplementary information that identifies the cast members, functioning as a non-essential addition to the main narrative.
The information inside the parentheses is grammatically essential, and its removal would render the sentence syntactically incomplete.
The use of parentheses indicates that the names of the actors are being used as a direct replacement for the characters' names mentioned later in the text.
The Hodgsoniana blog’s owner mentions the 150th anniversary alongside Hodgson's obscurity. What does this imply?
He is suggesting that, after more than a century, Hodgson’s life and work haven’t received the attention they deserve.
He argues that, despite the passage of time, Hodgson’s life and work have finally caught scholars’ attention.
He is implying a contradiction between historical obscurity and canonical recognition by scholars like Sam Gafford.
He is celebrating Hodgson’s newfound recognition online, despite being ignored by scholars.
He is arguing that, despite being very popular during his lifetime, Hodgson fell into obscurity.
No contexto das novas tecnologias de comunicação, o ensino de Inglês deve considerar que:
a linguagem digital empobrece a competência linguística.
o inglês escrito e falado se mantém rigidamente separados.
práticas multimodais ampliam os letramentos contemporâneos.
gêneros digitais não possuem valor pedagógico.
When teaching complex grammatical structures such as the Causative form (have/get something done), teachers must address both the syntactic arrangement and the semantic implication of agency. Choose the alternative that correctly describes the semantic nuance of the causative in "She had her roof repaired".
The subject (She) arranged for the action to be performed by a third party (agent), emphasizing the result rather than the agent itself, who is often omitted.
The sentence is grammatically equivalent to "She repaired her roof", with the causative form serving merely as a formal stylistic variation without semantic change.
The subject (She) performed the action of repairing the roof herself, but the structure implies that it was a difficult task completed with effort.
The structure implies that the subject (She) was coerced or forced into repairing the roof against her will by an external authority.
In the sentence “Your muscles become used to the stress and the testosterone, the adrenaline and endorphins”, the words testosterone, adrenaline, and endorphins belong to the same grammatical class and function in the sentence as
verbs.
nouns.
adverbs.
adjectives.
During an oral assessment, the teacher uses a rubric with criteria such as fluency, accuracy, pronunciation and interaction. This practice is an example of:
Holistic scoring of written texts.
Discrete-point testing of vocabulary.
Multiple-choice testing of grammar.
True/false comprehension checking.
Analytic rating of speaking performance.